If I may be permitted to offer an amendment

One of Kentucky’s senators, Rand Paul, recently offered a resolution hat would require a full reading of a bill.  As Paul’s web site states:

“Senator Rand Paul (Ky.) today introduced a resolution to change Senate rules to provide sufficient time for legislation to be read before being considered by the U.S. Senate. The waiting period point of order would require all bills, amendments, and conference reports to be filed for one day for every 20 pages before it can be considered.”

I would add an amendment to this.  The change would require that a senator or representative prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that (s)he actually understands what (s)he is talking about when it comes to proposed legislation.  For example, as a taxpayer (and, thus, Paul’s boss), I would ask that Paul actually understand what the National Institute of Food and Agriculture really is.

According to Paul (see, for example, this link):

National Institute of Food and Agriculture is the parent agency to the Agriculture Research Service. NIFA is essentially the communications arm to spread ARS information to the public.

I’m sorry, but that goes beyond wrong.  It’s actually embarrassing that a US Senator could be so badly misinformed.  I’ts even worse that he is willing to act on this foolish disinformation.

For those who are interested, NIFA is the USDA unit that funds extramural competitive grants that address issues of importance to food and agriculture.  It’s a granting agency, not a PR firm.

I propose that an elected official be required, in full public view, to take and pass tests that deal with subject matter in legislation that they are proposing.  To give the measure some power, I would further propose that legislators that fail said tests be required to forfeit some percentage of their own personal fortunes.  This would bring some personal accountability to the legislative process.

Just my own opinion.  From one who sometimes cannot believe the pranks being played on the public by the people in Washington.

2 Responses to If I may be permitted to offer an amendment

  1. Clem says:

    Thanks for the R Paul link… if I read it right he’s suggesting the whole ARS needs to go as well. Wow.

  2. big dick says:

    big dick

    If I may be permitted to offer an amendment | The RNA Underworld

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: